Friday, September 16, 2011

A Chinese Village

Below is a joke on Chinese economy that is currently being circulated widely on Chinese social networks: 

There is a village that only has one restaurant. Everyone in the village has to eat at that restaurant. ?

Villager: Why cant we have more than one restaurant??
Waiter: Our village is in a stage of development where more than one restaurant can lead to chaos, so we only have one restaurant. ?

Villager: But the food here is really not good!?
Waiter: Our restaurant has only been developing for a short time. Even if the food tasted worse than this, at least its our own food! ?

Villager: But cant it be a little cheaper??
Waiter: That would not suit the conditions of our village; the restaurant also needs to develop.?
Villager: But the employees of the restaurant are all driving Mercedes Benz cars!
Waiter: To ensure fair and uncorrupt staff, you need to pay them high salaries.?

Villager: But last year, you lent all the profits of the restaurant to another village.?
Waiter: This is the village policy, you dont need to worry about it. ?

Villager: I heard that the guy in charge of purchasing took all the money for buying vegetables and ran away to another village. ?
Waiter: That type of employee is very rare. ?

Villager: What about that time when we found sand inside the steamed buns? ?
Waiter: Dont worry, we have already fired that chef, he didnt have the right qualifications. ?

Villager: So when weve got so many problems, why do you still hang up certificates of high quality? Why do you tell oursiders that everyone is eating so well? ?
Waiter: For whose interests are you speaking? What a waste that the village has raised you!?
Villager: The grain was grown by the peasant farmers, the restaurant was built by the workers, and the chef is one of us common people. ?
Waiter: Look at M village taking advantage of L village! M Village is really hegemonistic.?
Villager: I cant even get a decent meal, what do these other things have to do with me? Why dont other villages have all these problems we have here? ?
Waiter: Whenever you talk about yourself, you can only say only bad things, when you talk about others, you say everything is good. You village traitor!

Saturday, August 20, 2011

The Lok Pal story

This article was published in the Indian Express on April 8, 2011
Dodging the Drafts

By Kaushiki Sanyal and C.V. Madhukar

Social activist, Anna Hazares fast unto death for the enactment of a strong Lok Pal Bill has provided an impetus to examine not only the Bill proposed by civil society activists but suggestions made by various experts.

The idea of establishing an authority where the citizen can seek redress against administrative acts of the government was first mooted in 1963 during a debate on Demands for Grants for the Law Ministry. Under the existing system, a citizen can either move court or seek other remedies such as petitioning his Member of Parliament. However, these remedies are limited because they maybe too cumbersome or specific grievances may not be addressed. Also, the laws that penalise corrupt officials do not have provision to redress specific grievances of citizens. Currently, corrupt public officials can be penalised under the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Both these laws require the investigating agency to get prior sanction of the central or state government before it can initiate the prosecution process in a court.

The office of the Lok Pal or an Ombudsman seeks to provide a forum for citizens to complain against public officials. The Lok Pal would inquire into such complaints and provide some redressal to citizens. The basic idea of the institution of Lok Pal was borrowed from the concept of Ombudsman in countries such as Finland, Norway, Denmark, Sweden, U.K. and New Zealand. Presently, about 140 countries have the office of the Ombudsman. In Sweden, Denmark and Finland, the office of the Ombudsman can redress citizens grievances by either directly receiving complaints from the public or suo moto. However, in the UK, the office of the Parliamentary Commissioner can receive complaints only through Members of Parliament (to whom the citizen can complain). Sweden and Finland also have the power to prosecute erring public servants.

The first Lok Pal Bill in India was introduced in 1968, which lapsed with the dissolution of the Lok Sabha. The Bill was introduced seven more times in Parliament, the last time in 2001. Each time it lapsed except in 1985 when it was withdrawn.

Several commissions have examined the need for a Lok Pal and suggested ways to make it effective, without violating Constitutional principles. They include: the First Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) of 1966, the National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution of 2002 and the Second Administrative Reforms Commission of 2007. The Lok Pal Bills that were introduced were referred to various Parliamentary committees (the last three Bills were referred to the Standing Committee on Home Affairs).

The First ARC report recommended that two independent authorities be created to redress grievances: first, a Lok Pal, to deal with complaints against the administrative acts of Ministers or secretaries of government at the centre and the state; and second, a Lokayukta in each state and at the centre, to deal with complaints against the administrative acts of other officials. Both these authorities should be independent of the executive, judiciary and legislature and shall be appointed by the President on advice of the Prime Minister, Leader of the Opposition and the Chief Justice of India.

The National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution urged that the Constitution should provide for the appointment of the Lok Pal and Lokayuktas in the states but suggested that the Prime Minister should be kept out of the purview of the authority.
The Second Administrative Commission, formed in 2005, also recommended that the office of the Lok Pal be established without delay. It was in favour of including Ministers, Chief Ministers and Members of Parliament. However, it wanted to keep the Prime Minister outside the Lok Pals ambit. The ARC also recommended that a reasonable time-limit for investigation of different types of cases should be fixed.

The 1996, 1998 and 2001 Bill covered Prime Minister and MPs. The Standing Committee examining the 1998 Bill recommended that the government examine two basic issues before going forward with the Bill: first, MPs are deemed to be public servants under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. If they are also brought under the purview of Lok Pal it may be tantamount to double jeopardy; and second, subjecting MPs to an outside disciplinary authority may affect supremacy of Parliament.

The 2001 Bill was also referred to the Standing Committee, which accepted that the Prime Minister and MPs should be included in the Bill. It further recommended that a separate legislation be enacted to ensure accountability of the judiciary. It however stated that the Bill did not address public grievances but focussed on corruption in high places.

The states have been more successful in establishing the Lokayuktas. So far 18 states have enacted legislation to set up the office of Lokayukta. While Karnataka Lokayukta is often hailed as a successful case, several other states have had limited success in combating corruption since all of them are recommendatory bodies with limited powers to enforce their findings.

A Group of Ministers is looking into ways to tackle corruption, including the establishment of a Lok Pal. A public debate on the issues raised by various committees would help iron out the weaknesses of any proposed legislation.

This article was published in the Indian Express on April 8, 2011

Sunday, August 7, 2011

हे श्याम सुंदर हे मुरलीधर

हे श्याम सुंदर हे मुरलीधर
केहन बिगड़ल तकदीर देलउं

हम बालापन के मित्र छलहुं
खेललहुं-कुदलहुं संगे-संगे

हे श्याम सुंदर हे मुरलीधर
केहन बिगड़ल तकदीर देलहुं

हम बालापन के मित्र छलहुं
पढ़लहुं लिखलहुं संगे संगे

अपने त्रिलोकीनाथ भेलहुं
हमरा बखरा में भिख देलहुं

जय-जय भै‍रवि असुर भयाउनि

जय-जय भै‍रवि असुर भयाउनि
पशुपति भामिनी माया
सहज सुमति कर दियउ गोसाउनि
अनुगति गति तुअ पाया
वासर रैनि सबासन शोभित
चरण चन्‍द्रमणि चूड़ा
कतओक दैत्‍य मारि मुख मेलल
कतओ उगिलि कएल कूड़ा
सामर बरन नयन अनुरंजित
जलद जोग फुलकोका
कट-कट विकट ओठ पुट पांडरि
लिधुर फेन उठ फोंका
घन-घन-घनय घुंघरू कत बाजय
हन-हन कर तुअ काता
विद्यापति कवि तुअ पद सेवक
पुत्र बिसरू जनि माता

 ..............साभार विद्यापति..............

Monday, July 25, 2011

वो मधुर बातें वो मधुर निंदिया

वो मधुर बातें वो मधुर निंदिया
निंदियों में तुमसा वो मधुर सपना
सपनो में अपना अपनों मे तुम सा

अब नहीं हैं....

न मधुर रातें न मधुर निंदिया
न मधुर सपना न मधुर चैना

Friday, May 6, 2011

वह परेशान है

वह परेशान है

क्यों परेशान है
यह किसी को नहीं पता
बस परेशान है

अच्छी चीजें उसे अच्छी नहीं लगतीं
बुरी चीजों से उकताता नहीं
ऐसा लगता है जैसे कुछ मरा हुआ हो
उसके अंदर
या फिर मरता जा रहा हो

शांत सी लगती
उसकी सांसों पर मत जाओ
वो तो चलती ही हैं

टुटुर- टुकुर ताकती
उसकी आंखों पर मत जाओ
वो तो ताकती ही हैं

देखना है तो वो देखो
जो वह दिखा नहीं सकता
जो वह बता नहीं सकता

देखना है तो उस एहसास को देखो
जिसे महसूस करना
उसने बंद कर दिया है

जिसे साथ लेकर जीना
उसके लिए मरने से अधिक
पीड़ादायक है